We love to believe that kindness is something innate. As if it’s a stable trait: you’re either generous or you’re not. But in real life, every act of helping is a moment of choice. Should you assist a colleague or finish your own task? Should you get off the couch to hold the door or stay in your comfort zone? We constantly weigh our options.
A study published in Nature Communications revealed that the willingness to help is largely determined not by character, but by the environment. People tend to be more generous when they are in “scarce” conditions—meaning when attractive opportunities are limited. Conversely, when there are plenty of appealing options, selfishness tends to increase, reports ZMУ Science.
How It Was Tested
Researchers from the University of Birmingham engaged over 500 participants in experiments using a method known as “foraging.” While watching a nature documentary, participants were periodically presented with choices.
They could:
- earn points for themselves,
- or expend physical effort (for example, by squeezing a handgrip) to earn a reward for a stranger.
The main variable was the environment.
In “rich” conditions, lucrative rewards appeared frequently. In “poor” conditions, they were rare and less valuable.
The results were clear: in environments with limited resources, people were more likely to agree to help others. When opportunities for personal gain increased, altruism decreased.
A Parallel with Nature
The model obtained resembles classic observations of animals. In environments with an abundance of food, birds sift through and reject lower-quality prey, waiting for something better. Where resources are scarce, they seize any available opportunity.
It seems that humans operate under a similar logic when making decisions about helping.
“We believe our study is the first to reliably test the impact of the environment on decisions about helping. It indicates a significant influence of surroundings: a poorer environment may stimulate greater generosity,” says Professor Patricia Lockwood, the senior author of the study.
Self-Centeredness Remains
Despite the increase in generosity under conditions of scarcity, participants still more often chose rewards for themselves. Self-centeredness persisted—as it has in many previous experiments.
However, what’s important is that the intensity of this self-centeredness varied depending on the context. The modeling showed that the “opportunity cost” of helping—that is, what a person gives up—was lower in poor conditions, especially if the reward was intended for someone else.
“Helping behavior is fundamental to forming and maintaining communities, so understanding how people respond to their environment when making decisions about generosity is critically important,” notes Dr. Todd Vogel, the lead author of the study.
Personal Traits Matter—but Not Decisively
Individual characteristics also played a role. People with higher levels of empathy or utilitarian beliefs perceived helping as less “costly” and were more willing to interrupt their own tasks. Meanwhile, anxiety and depression had little impact on their choices.
Interestingly, similar mechanisms have been described by psychologists in other studies: sometimes, simply changing the context or the role in which a person imagines themselves can enhance pro-social behavior.
What This Means on a Broader Scale
The findings of the study extend beyond the laboratory. Levels of charity, volunteering, or even daily acts of mutual assistance may depend on how many attractive alternatives surround us. Besides context, generosity also hinges on personal characteristics. For instance, research has shown that men and women may respond differently to opportunities to share resources, as illustrated in the article .
Interestingly, similar mechanisms have been described by psychologists in other works: sometimes, simply changing the context or the role in which a person imagines themselves can enhance pro-social behavior. For more on how role-playing and shifts in perception help us become better, read the article .
In a world overflowing with opportunities, kindness can become selective. In a more constrained environment, it tends to manifest more frequently. In a world overflowing with opportunities, kindness can become selective. In a more constrained environment, it tends to manifest more frequently.
“Our research shows that different opportunities in everyday life can significantly influence people’s willingness to stop and help others,” summarizes Vogel.
In times of economic change and inequality, this serves as a reminder: generosity is not just an internal trait. It is shaped by the conditions in which we live.
Photo: Unsplash
